The request

From Laura Bennett, Head of Finance
Your goal
Set result to a DataFrame with columns department, n_employees, avg_salary (mean salary rounded to 2), only for departments with at least 7 employees, sorted by avg_salary from highest to lowest, index reset.
- Use the
employeesDataFramenot done yet - Show exactly
departmentn_employeesavg_salarynot done yet - 6 rows, sorted as askednot done yet
Your code
Loading the editor…
Reference solution
| employee_id | first_name | last_name | department | title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catherine | Hale | Executive | Chief Executive Officer |
| 2 | Robert | Kim | Executive | Chief Operating Officer |
| 3 | Megan | Collins | Sales | Head of Sales |
| 4 | Chloe | Gutierrez | Sales | Account Executive |
Mote checks your result
Press Run. Each row that matches the goal becomes a firefly in your lantern.
What Laura gets, and why
DataFrames
Loaded for you as pandas DataFrames, plus pd and np.
employees60 rows · 8 columns
employee_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarchardepartmentvarchartitlevarcharmanager_idintegerhire_datedatesalaryinteger
| employee_id | first_name | last_name | department | title | manager_id | hire_date | salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catherine | Hale | Executive | Chief Executive Officer | NaN | 2016-03-01 | 285000 |
| 2 | Robert | Kim | Executive | Chief Operating Officer | 1 | 2017-01-09 | 235000 |
| 3 | Megan | Collins | Sales | Head of Sales | 1 | 2018-04-16 | 172000 |
| 4 | Chloe | Gutierrez | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2020-01-21 | 72000 |
| 5 | Frank | Bell | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2023-05-21 | 73000 |
customers2,018 rows · 9 columns
customer_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarcharemailvarcharcityvarcharstatevarcharsignup_datedatesegmentvarcharreferral_sourcevarchar
| customer_id | first_name | last_name | city | state | signup_date | segment | referral_source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen | Hudson | owen.hudson@icloud.com | San Francisco | CA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | search |
| 2 | Douglas | Mendoza | dmendoza69@gmail.com | Atlanta | GA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | NaN |
| 3 | Henry | Brooks | hbrooks@lakesidecafe.com | Los Angeles | CA | 2022-06-04 | business | NaN |
| 4 | Brian | Graham | bgraham@bluecedarhomes.com | Seattle | WA | 2022-06-06 | business | |
| 5 | Kyle | Jimenez | kjimenez27@yahoo.com | Indianapolis | IN | 2022-06-07 | consumer | NaN |
products120 rows · 8 columns
product_idintegernamevarcharcategoryvarcharsubcategoryvarcharunit_pricedecimalunit_costdecimallaunched_ondateis_activeboolean
| product_id | name | category | subcategory | unit_price | unit_cost | launched_on | is_active |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Vale Velvet Loveseat | Furniture | Sofas | 1659.00 | NaN | 2023-09-11 | true |
| 102 | Alder Oak Coffee Table | Furniture | Tables | 919.00 | 503.50 | 2024-05-16 | true |
| 103 | Orchard Rattan Dining Chair | Furniture | Chairs | 789.00 | 429.87 | 2023-05-27 | true |
| 104 | Upland Oak Bookcase | Furniture | Storage | 429.00 | 214.70 | 2022-12-20 | true |
| 105 | Avery Leather Bed Frame | Furniture | Beds | 449.00 | 232.70 | 2021-08-31 | true |
orders12,000 rows · 7 columns
order_idintegercustomer_idintegerorder_datetimestampstatusvarcharchannelvarcharshipping_feedecimalcoupon_codevarchar
| order_id | customer_id | order_date | status | channel | shipping_fee | coupon_code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | 125 | 2023-01-01 20:51:19 | completed | web | 0.00 | NaN |
| 1002 | 156 | 2023-01-02 07:58:46 | completed | web | 0.00 | NaN |
| 1003 | 22 | 2023-01-02 10:25:27 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1004 | 48 | 2023-01-02 11:21:51 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1005 | 82 | 2023-01-02 11:43:36 | completed | web | 0.00 | WELCOME10 |
order_items30,338 rows · 6 columns
order_item_idintegerorder_idintegerproduct_idintegerquantityintegerunit_pricedecimaldiscount_pctdecimal
| order_item_id | order_id | product_id | quantity | unit_price | discount_pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1001 | 121 | 9 | 31.99 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 1001 | 154 | 3 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 1002 | 154 | 4 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 1002 | 194 | 1 | 149.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1002 | 193 | 2 | 19.99 | 0.00 |
returns1,673 rows · 5 columns
return_idintegerorder_item_idintegerreturned_ondatereasonvarcharrefund_amountdecimal
| return_id | order_item_id | returned_on | reason | refund_amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 2023-01-10 | damaged | 83.69 |
| 2 | 42 | 2023-01-10 | wrong_item | 19.99 |
| 3 | 105 | 2023-01-14 | wrong_item | 10.99 |
| 4 | 24 | 2023-01-16 | changed_mind | 26.99 |
| 5 | 126 | 2023-01-16 | late | 20.99 |
web_sessions40,000 rows · 7 columns
session_idintegercustomer_idintegerstarted_attimestampdevicevarcharsourcevarcharpages_viewedintegerconvertedboolean
| session_id | customer_id | started_at | device | source | pages_viewed | converted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NaN | 2023-01-01 23:02:24 | mobile | paid | 1 | false |
| 2 | 18 | 2023-01-01 15:07:49 | desktop | paid | 1 | false |
| 3 | NaN | 2023-01-01 16:55:46 | desktop | direct | 7 | false |
| 4 | NaN | 2023-01-01 12:43:28 | mobile | organic | 3 | false |
| 5 | NaN | 2023-01-01 13:06:21 | mobile | social | 2 | false |
marketing_spend3,276 rows · 3 columns
spend_datedatechannelvarcharamountdecimal
| spend_date | channel | amount |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-01 | paid | 492.99 |
| 2023-01-01 | 37.38 | |
| 2023-01-01 | social | 200.53 |
| 2023-01-02 | paid | 709.13 |
| 2023-01-02 | 64.13 |
The lesson
Filter before or after?
There are two very different filters in a grouped report:
- Before grouping, you filter rows: “only completed orders”, “only 2025”. This changes what goes into each group.
- After grouping, you filter groups: “only departments with at least seven people”, “only customers who spent over $1,000”. This needs the aggregated numbers first.
In pandas, both are ordinary boolean masks. The difference is just which table you apply them to.
Aggregate, then mask
by_dept = employees.groupby("department", as_index=False).agg(
n_employees=("employee_id", "count"),
avg_salary=("salary", "mean"),
)
big = by_dept[by_dept["n_employees"] >= 7]
by_dept is a normal DataFrame with one row per department, so you filter it exactly like any other
table. Then sort and tidy up:
big.sort_values("avg_salary", ascending=False).reset_index(drop=True)
Why the threshold matters
An average of two salaries can swing wildly with one hire. The Executive team has two people, both very senior, and including it would put it at the top of any ranking while telling you nothing about pay policy. Minimum group sizes are standard practice for averages, rates and any comparison between groups. In customer analytics you’ll often see rules like “only products with at least 30 orders” before ranking by return rate.
State the threshold in your output or notes. A ranking that silently drops three departments will confuse the first person who goes looking for one of them.
Keeping the original rows: filter and transform
Sometimes you want the employees in big departments, not the summary. groupby().filter keeps
whole groups that pass a test:
employees.groupby("department").filter(lambda g: len(g) >= 7)
transform returns a value per original row, aligned with the original index, which is great for
masks and for “compare each row to its group”:
dept_size = employees.groupby("department")["employee_id"].transform("count")
employees[dept_size >= 7]
employees["vs_dept_avg"] = (
employees["salary"] - employees.groupby("department")["salary"].transform("mean")
)
That second example, each person’s salary minus their department’s average, is a classic interview
task, and transform is the cleanest answer.
Common mistakes
- Filtering the raw employee rows with
n_employees, which doesn’t exist until you aggregate. - Applying the threshold to the wrong number, such as average salary instead of headcount.
- Rounding before filtering on a rounded value, which can push borderline groups across the line. Round at the end.
If you know SQL
Filtering after aggregation is SQL’s HAVING COUNT(*) >= 7. Filtering before is WHERE. In pandas
both are masks; only the timing differs.
Lantern lit!
Practised: groupbynamed aggregationfilter after aggregationsort values
- Solved
- No hints
- First run
