The request

From Jordan Reyes, Head of Marketing
Your goal
Set result to a dict: "rate_a" and "rate_b", the conversion rate (share of sessions with converted True) in each arm, "abs_lift", rate B minus rate A, and "rel_lift", that difference divided by rate A. Compute from unrounded rates, then round all four to 4 decimals.
- Use the
web_sessionsDataFramenot done yet - Store a dict in
resultnot done yet
Each arm has 2,604 sessions. Arm A converted 98 of them, arm B 105. The axis starts at zero, so bar heights compare honestly.
Show the numbers
| Arm | Sessions that converted |
|---|---|
| A: no banner | 3.8% |
| B: banner | 4% |
Your code
Loading the editor…
Reference solution
| session_id | customer_id | started_at | device | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NaN | 2023-01-01 23:02:24 | mobile | paid |
| 2 | 18 | 2023-01-01 15:07:49 | desktop | paid |
| 3 | NaN | 2023-01-01 16:55:46 | desktop | direct |
| 4 | NaN | 2023-01-01 12:43:28 | mobile | organic |
Mote checks your result
Press Run. Each row that matches the goal becomes a firefly in your lantern.
What Jordan gets, and why
DataFrames
Loaded for you as pandas DataFrames, plus pd and np.
web_sessions40,000 rows · 7 columns
session_idintegercustomer_idintegerstarted_attimestampdevicevarcharsourcevarcharpages_viewedintegerconvertedboolean
| session_id | customer_id | started_at | device | source | pages_viewed | converted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NaN | 2023-01-01 23:02:24 | mobile | paid | 1 | false |
| 2 | 18 | 2023-01-01 15:07:49 | desktop | paid | 1 | false |
| 3 | NaN | 2023-01-01 16:55:46 | desktop | direct | 7 | false |
| 4 | NaN | 2023-01-01 12:43:28 | mobile | organic | 3 | false |
| 5 | NaN | 2023-01-01 13:06:21 | mobile | social | 2 | false |
customers2,018 rows · 9 columns
customer_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarcharemailvarcharcityvarcharstatevarcharsignup_datedatesegmentvarcharreferral_sourcevarchar
| customer_id | first_name | last_name | city | state | signup_date | segment | referral_source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen | Hudson | owen.hudson@icloud.com | San Francisco | CA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | search |
| 2 | Douglas | Mendoza | dmendoza69@gmail.com | Atlanta | GA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | NaN |
| 3 | Henry | Brooks | hbrooks@lakesidecafe.com | Los Angeles | CA | 2022-06-04 | business | NaN |
| 4 | Brian | Graham | bgraham@bluecedarhomes.com | Seattle | WA | 2022-06-06 | business | |
| 5 | Kyle | Jimenez | kjimenez27@yahoo.com | Indianapolis | IN | 2022-06-07 | consumer | NaN |
products120 rows · 8 columns
product_idintegernamevarcharcategoryvarcharsubcategoryvarcharunit_pricedecimalunit_costdecimallaunched_ondateis_activeboolean
| product_id | name | category | subcategory | unit_price | unit_cost | launched_on | is_active |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Vale Velvet Loveseat | Furniture | Sofas | 1659.00 | NaN | 2023-09-11 | true |
| 102 | Alder Oak Coffee Table | Furniture | Tables | 919.00 | 503.50 | 2024-05-16 | true |
| 103 | Orchard Rattan Dining Chair | Furniture | Chairs | 789.00 | 429.87 | 2023-05-27 | true |
| 104 | Upland Oak Bookcase | Furniture | Storage | 429.00 | 214.70 | 2022-12-20 | true |
| 105 | Avery Leather Bed Frame | Furniture | Beds | 449.00 | 232.70 | 2021-08-31 | true |
orders12,000 rows · 7 columns
order_idintegercustomer_idintegerorder_datetimestampstatusvarcharchannelvarcharshipping_feedecimalcoupon_codevarchar
| order_id | customer_id | order_date | status | channel | shipping_fee | coupon_code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | 125 | 2023-01-01 20:51:19 | completed | web | 0.00 | NaN |
| 1002 | 156 | 2023-01-02 07:58:46 | completed | web | 0.00 | NaN |
| 1003 | 22 | 2023-01-02 10:25:27 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1004 | 48 | 2023-01-02 11:21:51 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1005 | 82 | 2023-01-02 11:43:36 | completed | web | 0.00 | WELCOME10 |
order_items30,338 rows · 6 columns
order_item_idintegerorder_idintegerproduct_idintegerquantityintegerunit_pricedecimaldiscount_pctdecimal
| order_item_id | order_id | product_id | quantity | unit_price | discount_pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1001 | 121 | 9 | 31.99 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 1001 | 154 | 3 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 1002 | 154 | 4 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 1002 | 194 | 1 | 149.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1002 | 193 | 2 | 19.99 | 0.00 |
returns1,673 rows · 5 columns
return_idintegerorder_item_idintegerreturned_ondatereasonvarcharrefund_amountdecimal
| return_id | order_item_id | returned_on | reason | refund_amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 2023-01-10 | damaged | 83.69 |
| 2 | 42 | 2023-01-10 | wrong_item | 19.99 |
| 3 | 105 | 2023-01-14 | wrong_item | 10.99 |
| 4 | 24 | 2023-01-16 | changed_mind | 26.99 |
| 5 | 126 | 2023-01-16 | late | 20.99 |
employees60 rows · 8 columns
employee_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarchardepartmentvarchartitlevarcharmanager_idintegerhire_datedatesalaryinteger
| employee_id | first_name | last_name | department | title | manager_id | hire_date | salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catherine | Hale | Executive | Chief Executive Officer | NaN | 2016-03-01 | 285000 |
| 2 | Robert | Kim | Executive | Chief Operating Officer | 1 | 2017-01-09 | 235000 |
| 3 | Megan | Collins | Sales | Head of Sales | 1 | 2018-04-16 | 172000 |
| 4 | Chloe | Gutierrez | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2020-01-21 | 72000 |
| 5 | Frank | Bell | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2023-05-21 | 73000 |
marketing_spend3,276 rows · 3 columns
spend_datedatechannelvarcharamountdecimal
| spend_date | channel | amount |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-01 | paid | 492.99 |
| 2023-01-01 | 37.38 | |
| 2023-01-01 | social | 200.53 |
| 2023-01-02 | paid | 709.13 |
| 2023-01-02 | 64.13 |
The lesson
Conversion rate is a mean
A session either converted or it didn’t. Store that as True/False and the conversion rate is simply the mean of the column, because pandas counts True as 1 and False as 0:
test.groupby("arm")["converted"].mean()
# A 0.0376
# B 0.0403
Arm B, the banner, converted 105 of 2,604 sessions; arm A converted 98 of 2,604. It is worth
printing the counts next to the rates (.agg(["size", "sum", "mean"])), because 105 versus 98 is
a much more honest picture of the evidence than 4.03% versus 3.76%.
Absolute and relative lift
There are two ways to say how much better B did, and people mix them up constantly:
- Absolute lift:
rate_b - rate_a= 0.0027, or 0.27 percentage points. - Relative lift:
(rate_b - rate_a) / rate_a= 0.071, or 7.1%.
The relative number sounds more impressive, which is why it ends up in headlines. Both are correct; what matters is saying which one you mean. “Conversion rose 7%” read by someone who thinks in points sounds like 3.8% became 10.8%, which is not what happened.
Use points (pp) for differences of rates, and percent for relative change. Write it as “+0.27 pp (+7.1% relative)” and nobody can misread it.
Seven percent of what?
Seven extra orders in two months is the real-world size of this difference. With conversions this rare, a handful of sessions moves the rate a lot: if eight of B’s 105 buyers had left without ordering, B would be the losing arm. That is the question the next level answers properly: how much of this gap could be noise?
Common mistakes
- Rounding before dividing. Round 0.037634 and 0.040323 to 0.0376 and 0.0403 first and the relative lift comes out 0.0718 instead of 0.0714. Compute with full precision, round at the end.
- Dividing by the wrong arm. Relative lift is measured against the control (A). Dividing by B gives a different number that answers a different question.
- Counting rows instead of sessions with a conversion.
count()counts non-missing values, so it counts every session. Usesum()for conversions,mean()for the rate. - Declaring a winner from the lift alone. Every test has a winner if you only compare two numbers. The lift is the estimate; whether it is real is a separate question.
Lantern lit!
Practised: ab testconversion rateliftrelative change
- Solved
- No hints
- First run
