1. Lighthouse

Level 2 · Which return reasons cost the most?

The request

From Angela Rivera, Head of Customer Support

“I'm told 'changed my mind' is our biggest return problem. Can you chart how much we refunded for each return reason, so I can see where the money actually goes?”

Your goal

Set result to a Series with the total refund_amount per reason in returns, rounded to 2, indexed by reason, values named refund_amount, sorted from the largest total to the smallest. Draw it as a horizontal bar chart with the largest bar at the top.

  • Use the returns DataFramenot done yet
  • Show exactly reason refund_amountnot done yet
  • 4 rows, sorted as askednot done yet

Your code

Python

Loading the editor…

    ResultPreview of returns · press Run to see yours
    Preview of returns
    return_idorder_item_idreturned_onreasonrefund_amount
    1142023-01-10damaged83.69
    2422023-01-10wrong_item19.99
    31052023-01-14wrong_item10.99
    4242023-01-16changed_mind26.99

    Mote checks your result

    Press Run. Each row that matches the goal becomes a firefly in your lantern.

    DataFrames

    Loaded for you as pandas DataFrames, plus pd and np.

    returns1,673 rows · 5 columns
    • return_idinteger
    • order_item_idinteger
    • returned_ondate
    • reasonvarchar
    • refund_amountdecimal
    First 5 rows of returns
    return_idorder_item_idreturned_onreasonrefund_amount
    1142023-01-10damaged83.69
    2422023-01-10wrong_item19.99
    31052023-01-14wrong_item10.99
    4242023-01-16changed_mind26.99
    51262023-01-16late20.99
    customers2,018 rows · 9 columns
    • customer_idinteger
    • first_namevarchar
    • last_namevarchar
    • emailvarchar
    • cityvarchar
    • statevarchar
    • signup_datedate
    • segmentvarchar
    • referral_sourcevarchar
    First 5 rows of customers
    customer_idfirst_namelast_nameemailcitystatesignup_datesegmentreferral_source
    1OwenHudsonowen.hudson@icloud.comSan FranciscoCA2022-06-02consumersearch
    2DouglasMendozadmendoza69@gmail.comAtlantaGA2022-06-02consumerNaN
    3HenryBrookshbrooks@lakesidecafe.comLos AngelesCA2022-06-04businessNaN
    4BrianGrahambgraham@bluecedarhomes.comSeattleWA2022-06-06businesspinterest
    5KyleJimenezkjimenez27@yahoo.comIndianapolisIN2022-06-07consumerNaN
    products120 rows · 8 columns
    • product_idinteger
    • namevarchar
    • categoryvarchar
    • subcategoryvarchar
    • unit_pricedecimal
    • unit_costdecimal
    • launched_ondate
    • is_activeboolean
    First 5 rows of products
    product_idnamecategorysubcategoryunit_priceunit_costlaunched_onis_active
    101Vale Velvet LoveseatFurnitureSofas1659.00NaN2023-09-11true
    102Alder Oak Coffee TableFurnitureTables919.00503.502024-05-16true
    103Orchard Rattan Dining ChairFurnitureChairs789.00429.872023-05-27true
    104Upland Oak BookcaseFurnitureStorage429.00214.702022-12-20true
    105Avery Leather Bed FrameFurnitureBeds449.00232.702021-08-31true
    orders12,000 rows · 7 columns
    • order_idinteger
    • customer_idinteger
    • order_datetimestamp
    • statusvarchar
    • channelvarchar
    • shipping_feedecimal
    • coupon_codevarchar
    First 5 rows of orders
    order_idcustomer_idorder_datestatuschannelshipping_feecoupon_code
    10011252023-01-01 20:51:19completedweb0.00NaN
    10021562023-01-02 07:58:46completedweb0.00NaN
    1003222023-01-02 10:25:27completedmarketplace4.99WELCOME10
    1004482023-01-02 11:21:51completedmarketplace4.99WELCOME10
    1005822023-01-02 11:43:36completedweb0.00WELCOME10
    order_items30,338 rows · 6 columns
    • order_item_idinteger
    • order_idinteger
    • product_idinteger
    • quantityinteger
    • unit_pricedecimal
    • discount_pctdecimal
    First 5 rows of order_items
    order_item_idorder_idproduct_idquantityunit_pricediscount_pct
    11001121931.990.00
    21001154311.990.00
    31002154411.990.00
    410021941149.000.00
    51002193219.990.00
    employees60 rows · 8 columns
    • employee_idinteger
    • first_namevarchar
    • last_namevarchar
    • departmentvarchar
    • titlevarchar
    • manager_idinteger
    • hire_datedate
    • salaryinteger
    First 5 rows of employees
    employee_idfirst_namelast_namedepartmenttitlemanager_idhire_datesalary
    1CatherineHaleExecutiveChief Executive OfficerNaN2016-03-01285000
    2RobertKimExecutiveChief Operating Officer12017-01-09235000
    3MeganCollinsSalesHead of Sales12018-04-16172000
    4ChloeGutierrezSalesAccount Executive32020-01-2172000
    5FrankBellSalesAccount Executive32023-05-2173000
    web_sessions40,000 rows · 7 columns
    • session_idinteger
    • customer_idinteger
    • started_attimestamp
    • devicevarchar
    • sourcevarchar
    • pages_viewedinteger
    • convertedboolean
    First 5 rows of web_sessions
    session_idcustomer_idstarted_atdevicesourcepages_viewedconverted
    1NaN2023-01-01 23:02:24mobilepaid1false
    2182023-01-01 15:07:49desktoppaid1false
    3NaN2023-01-01 16:55:46desktopdirect7false
    4NaN2023-01-01 12:43:28mobileorganic3false
    5NaN2023-01-01 13:06:21mobilesocial2false
    marketing_spend3,276 rows · 3 columns
    • spend_datedate
    • channelvarchar
    • amountdecimal
    First 5 rows of marketing_spend
    spend_datechannelamount
    2023-01-01paid492.99
    2023-01-01email37.38
    2023-01-01social200.53
    2023-01-02paid709.13
    2023-01-02email64.13

    The lesson

    Bars compare categories

    Return reasons have no natural order, and Angela wants to compare their size. That’s a bar chart. The data is one number per reason:

    refunds = returns.groupby("reason")["refund_amount"].sum().round(2).sort_values(ascending=False)
    # changed_mind    132949.23
    # damaged         128729.46
    # late             57859.97
    # wrong_item       51735.20

    Always sort the bars by value. An alphabetical order makes the reader hunt for the biggest; a sorted one reads like a ranking at a glance.

    Vertical or horizontal

    ax.bar(x, heights) draws vertical bars, ax.barh(y, widths) horizontal ones. Pick horizontal when the labels are long (product names, job titles, reasons): they stay readable without tilting.

    There’s one trap. barh draws the first item at the bottom. With data sorted largest first, the largest bar ends up at the bottom. Two fixes:

    ax.barh(refunds.index, refunds.values)
    ax.invert_yaxis()                     # flip: first item on top
    
    # or sort ascending just for the chart
    s = refunds.sort_values()
    ax.barh(s.index, s.values)

    With pandas it’s one line, and it returns the Axes for the finishing touches: ax = refunds.sort_values().plot(kind="barh").

    Values on bars and one highlight color

    ax.bar_label writes each bar’s value at its end, so nobody has to read the axis:

    bars = ax.barh(refunds.index, refunds.values, color=colors)
    ax.bar_label(bars, labels=[f"${v / 1000:.0f}k" for v in refunds.values], padding=3)

    Color is for meaning, not decoration. Make every bar gray and give one bar a strong color: the one your title talks about. A list comprehension builds the colors in the same order as the bars:

    colors = ["#c0392b" if r == "damaged" else "#b0b0b0" for r in refunds.index]

    What the chart says

    Changed minds lead with $132,949.23 from 698 returns. Damaged items cost almost as much, $128,729.46, from only 477 returns, so each damaged return is more expensive. Together the two make up 71% of the $371,273.86 refunded. A packaging fix would attack a cost as large as the one Angela was worried about, and it is far easier to act on than customers changing their minds. That is the kind of finding the title should state.

    Common mistakes

    • Forgetting that barh draws bottom-up, so the “top” item lands at the bottom.
    • Leaving the bars unsorted. Readers compare neighbors; a ranking needs sorted bars.
    • Giving every bar its own color. It looks busy and hides the one bar that matters.
    • Starting the value axis above zero. A bar’s length is its value; cut the axis and the lengths lie.

    Pick what may run on this site. You can change this any time from "Cookie settings" at the bottom of every page.