1. Lighthouse

Level 7 · Debug: more paid-shipping orders than exist

The request

From Laura Bennett, Head of Finance

“The draft says 6,867 web and app orders paid for shipping. That can't be right: only 3,977 orders in the whole store paid any shipping at all. Can you fix the filter and give me the real number?”

Your goal

The starter code runs but counts the wrong orders. Fix it so result is the number of orders (an int) whose channel is 'web' or 'app' AND whose shipping_fee is greater than 0.

  • Use the orders DataFramenot done yet
  • Store a number in resultnot done yet

Your code

Python

Loading the editor…

    ResultPreview of orders · press Run to see yours
    Preview of orders
    order_idcustomer_idorder_datestatuschannel
    10011252023-01-01 20:51:19completedweb
    10021562023-01-02 07:58:46completedweb
    1003222023-01-02 10:25:27completedmarketplace
    1004482023-01-02 11:21:51completedmarketplace

    Mote checks your result

    Press Run. Each row that matches the goal becomes a firefly in your lantern.

    DataFrames

    Loaded for you as pandas DataFrames, plus pd and np.

    orders12,000 rows · 7 columns
    • order_idinteger
    • customer_idinteger
    • order_datetimestamp
    • statusvarchar
    • channelvarchar
    • shipping_feedecimal
    • coupon_codevarchar
    First 5 rows of orders
    order_idcustomer_idorder_datestatuschannelshipping_feecoupon_code
    10011252023-01-01 20:51:19completedweb0.00NaN
    10021562023-01-02 07:58:46completedweb0.00NaN
    1003222023-01-02 10:25:27completedmarketplace4.99WELCOME10
    1004482023-01-02 11:21:51completedmarketplace4.99WELCOME10
    1005822023-01-02 11:43:36completedweb0.00WELCOME10
    customers2,018 rows · 9 columns
    • customer_idinteger
    • first_namevarchar
    • last_namevarchar
    • emailvarchar
    • cityvarchar
    • statevarchar
    • signup_datedate
    • segmentvarchar
    • referral_sourcevarchar
    First 5 rows of customers
    customer_idfirst_namelast_nameemailcitystatesignup_datesegmentreferral_source
    1OwenHudsonowen.hudson@icloud.comSan FranciscoCA2022-06-02consumersearch
    2DouglasMendozadmendoza69@gmail.comAtlantaGA2022-06-02consumerNaN
    3HenryBrookshbrooks@lakesidecafe.comLos AngelesCA2022-06-04businessNaN
    4BrianGrahambgraham@bluecedarhomes.comSeattleWA2022-06-06businesspinterest
    5KyleJimenezkjimenez27@yahoo.comIndianapolisIN2022-06-07consumerNaN
    products120 rows · 8 columns
    • product_idinteger
    • namevarchar
    • categoryvarchar
    • subcategoryvarchar
    • unit_pricedecimal
    • unit_costdecimal
    • launched_ondate
    • is_activeboolean
    First 5 rows of products
    product_idnamecategorysubcategoryunit_priceunit_costlaunched_onis_active
    101Vale Velvet LoveseatFurnitureSofas1659.00NaN2023-09-11true
    102Alder Oak Coffee TableFurnitureTables919.00503.502024-05-16true
    103Orchard Rattan Dining ChairFurnitureChairs789.00429.872023-05-27true
    104Upland Oak BookcaseFurnitureStorage429.00214.702022-12-20true
    105Avery Leather Bed FrameFurnitureBeds449.00232.702021-08-31true
    order_items30,338 rows · 6 columns
    • order_item_idinteger
    • order_idinteger
    • product_idinteger
    • quantityinteger
    • unit_pricedecimal
    • discount_pctdecimal
    First 5 rows of order_items
    order_item_idorder_idproduct_idquantityunit_pricediscount_pct
    11001121931.990.00
    21001154311.990.00
    31002154411.990.00
    410021941149.000.00
    51002193219.990.00
    returns1,673 rows · 5 columns
    • return_idinteger
    • order_item_idinteger
    • returned_ondate
    • reasonvarchar
    • refund_amountdecimal
    First 5 rows of returns
    return_idorder_item_idreturned_onreasonrefund_amount
    1142023-01-10damaged83.69
    2422023-01-10wrong_item19.99
    31052023-01-14wrong_item10.99
    4242023-01-16changed_mind26.99
    51262023-01-16late20.99
    employees60 rows · 8 columns
    • employee_idinteger
    • first_namevarchar
    • last_namevarchar
    • departmentvarchar
    • titlevarchar
    • manager_idinteger
    • hire_datedate
    • salaryinteger
    First 5 rows of employees
    employee_idfirst_namelast_namedepartmenttitlemanager_idhire_datesalary
    1CatherineHaleExecutiveChief Executive OfficerNaN2016-03-01285000
    2RobertKimExecutiveChief Operating Officer12017-01-09235000
    3MeganCollinsSalesHead of Sales12018-04-16172000
    4ChloeGutierrezSalesAccount Executive32020-01-2172000
    5FrankBellSalesAccount Executive32023-05-2173000
    web_sessions40,000 rows · 7 columns
    • session_idinteger
    • customer_idinteger
    • started_attimestamp
    • devicevarchar
    • sourcevarchar
    • pages_viewedinteger
    • convertedboolean
    First 5 rows of web_sessions
    session_idcustomer_idstarted_atdevicesourcepages_viewedconverted
    1NaN2023-01-01 23:02:24mobilepaid1false
    2182023-01-01 15:07:49desktoppaid1false
    3NaN2023-01-01 16:55:46desktopdirect7false
    4NaN2023-01-01 12:43:28mobileorganic3false
    5NaN2023-01-01 13:06:21mobilesocial2false
    marketing_spend3,276 rows · 3 columns
    • spend_datedate
    • channelvarchar
    • amountdecimal
    First 5 rows of marketing_spend
    spend_datechannelamount
    2023-01-01paid492.99
    2023-01-01email37.38
    2023-01-01social200.53
    2023-01-02paid709.13
    2023-01-02email64.13

    The lesson

    Why the number is impossible

    Laura’s check is the best kind of debugging: a bound. 3,977 orders paid any shipping at all, so “web and app orders that paid shipping” must be a smaller number. 6,867 is bigger, so the filter is letting in rows it shouldn’t. Before you touch the code, ask which rows could be sneaking in.

    The answer is in how Python groups & and |. Just like * happens before + in arithmetic, & happens before |. The starter’s condition

    (orders["channel"] == "web") | (orders["channel"] == "app") & (orders["shipping_fee"] > 0)

    is read by Python as

    (orders["channel"] == "web") | ((orders["channel"] == "app") & (orders["shipping_fee"] > 0))

    That’s “every web order, plus app orders that paid shipping”. There are 5,913 web orders and 954 paid-shipping app orders: 5,913 + 954 = 6,867, exactly the wrong number in the draft.

    The fix: group the “or” yourself

    Put the “web or app” part in its own parentheses so it’s decided first:

    web_or_app = (orders["channel"] == "web") | (orders["channel"] == "app")
    paid = orders["shipping_fee"] > 0
    orders[web_or_app & paid]

    Naming the masks, as above, makes the logic easy to read and impossible to group wrongly. A shorter option avoids | altogether:

    orders[orders["channel"].isin(["web", "app"]) & (orders["shipping_fee"] > 0)]

    Both give 2,210 orders: 1,256 from web and 954 from the app. Marketplace orders are excluded even though 1,767 of them paid shipping, which is a big share: marketplace fees follow different rules.

    Checking a fix

    After a fix, test the pieces separately: count the web-or-app orders (10,233), count the paid ones (3,977), and confirm the combined filter is no bigger than either. Two quick numbers like these catch most filter bugs. You can count a mask directly with .sum(), because True counts as 1, so you don’t even need to filter the table to check each piece. Then add the per-channel counts back together and make sure they match the combined number.

    Common mistakes

    • Trusting the left-to-right reading. a | b & c means a | (b & c).
    • Leaving out the parentheses around each comparison: orders["channel"] == "web" | ... fails with a TypeError, because | binds tighter than ==.
    • Using and / or on Series, which raises ValueError: The truth value of a Series is ambiguous.
    • Returning the filtered DataFrame instead of its row count. The ticket asks for a number.

    Pick what may run on this site. You can change this any time from "Cookie settings" at the bottom of every page.