The request

From Megan Collins, Head of Sales
Your goal
Fix the query. For each completed order, find the date of the same customer's next completed order (orders sorted by order_date, ties broken by order_id). Return one row per segment (from customers) with: segment, reorders (completed orders that have a next completed order from the same customer) and avg_days_to_next (average days between the calendar dates of an order and the customer's next one, rounded to 1).
- Read from the
customerstablenot done yet - Read from the
orderstablenot done yet - Show exactly
segmentreordersavg_days_to_nextnot done yet
Your query
Loading the editor…
Reference solution
| customer_id | first_name | last_name | city | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen | Hudson | owen.hudson@icloud.com | San Francisco |
| 2 | Douglas | Mendoza | dmendoza69@gmail.com | Atlanta |
| 3 | Henry | Brooks | hbrooks@lakesidecafe.com | Los Angeles |
| 4 | Brian | Graham | bgraham@bluecedarhomes.com | Seattle |
Mote checks your result
Press Run. Each row that matches the goal becomes a firefly in your lantern.
What Megan gets, and why
Tables
Harbor & Pine store data, ready to query.
customers2,018 rows · 9 columns
customer_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarcharemailvarcharcityvarcharstatevarcharsignup_datedatesegmentvarcharreferral_sourcevarchar
| customer_id | first_name | last_name | city | state | signup_date | segment | referral_source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen | Hudson | owen.hudson@icloud.com | San Francisco | CA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | search |
| 2 | Douglas | Mendoza | dmendoza69@gmail.com | Atlanta | GA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | NULL |
| 3 | Henry | Brooks | hbrooks@lakesidecafe.com | Los Angeles | CA | 2022-06-04 | business | NULL |
| 4 | Brian | Graham | bgraham@bluecedarhomes.com | Seattle | WA | 2022-06-06 | business | |
| 5 | Kyle | Jimenez | kjimenez27@yahoo.com | Indianapolis | IN | 2022-06-07 | consumer | NULL |
orders12,000 rows · 7 columns
order_idintegercustomer_idintegerorder_datetimestampstatusvarcharchannelvarcharshipping_feedecimalcoupon_codevarchar
| order_id | customer_id | order_date | status | channel | shipping_fee | coupon_code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | 125 | 2023-01-01 20:51:19 | completed | web | 0.00 | NULL |
| 1002 | 156 | 2023-01-02 07:58:46 | completed | web | 0.00 | NULL |
| 1003 | 22 | 2023-01-02 10:25:27 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1004 | 48 | 2023-01-02 11:21:51 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1005 | 82 | 2023-01-02 11:43:36 | completed | web | 0.00 | WELCOME10 |
products120 rows · 8 columns
product_idintegernamevarcharcategoryvarcharsubcategoryvarcharunit_pricedecimalunit_costdecimallaunched_ondateis_activeboolean
| product_id | name | category | subcategory | unit_price | unit_cost | launched_on | is_active |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Vale Velvet Loveseat | Furniture | Sofas | 1659.00 | NULL | 2023-09-11 | true |
| 102 | Alder Oak Coffee Table | Furniture | Tables | 919.00 | 503.50 | 2024-05-16 | true |
| 103 | Orchard Rattan Dining Chair | Furniture | Chairs | 789.00 | 429.87 | 2023-05-27 | true |
| 104 | Upland Oak Bookcase | Furniture | Storage | 429.00 | 214.70 | 2022-12-20 | true |
| 105 | Avery Leather Bed Frame | Furniture | Beds | 449.00 | 232.70 | 2021-08-31 | true |
order_items30,338 rows · 6 columns
order_item_idintegerorder_idintegerproduct_idintegerquantityintegerunit_pricedecimaldiscount_pctdecimal
| order_item_id | order_id | product_id | quantity | unit_price | discount_pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1001 | 121 | 9 | 31.99 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 1001 | 154 | 3 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 1002 | 154 | 4 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 1002 | 194 | 1 | 149.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1002 | 193 | 2 | 19.99 | 0.00 |
returns1,673 rows · 5 columns
return_idintegerorder_item_idintegerreturned_ondatereasonvarcharrefund_amountdecimal
| return_id | order_item_id | returned_on | reason | refund_amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 2023-01-10 | damaged | 83.69 |
| 2 | 42 | 2023-01-10 | wrong_item | 19.99 |
| 3 | 105 | 2023-01-14 | wrong_item | 10.99 |
| 4 | 24 | 2023-01-16 | changed_mind | 26.99 |
| 5 | 126 | 2023-01-16 | late | 20.99 |
employees60 rows · 8 columns
employee_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarchardepartmentvarchartitlevarcharmanager_idintegerhire_datedatesalaryinteger
| employee_id | first_name | last_name | department | title | manager_id | hire_date | salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catherine | Hale | Executive | Chief Executive Officer | NULL | 2016-03-01 | 285000 |
| 2 | Robert | Kim | Executive | Chief Operating Officer | 1 | 2017-01-09 | 235000 |
| 3 | Megan | Collins | Sales | Head of Sales | 1 | 2018-04-16 | 172000 |
| 4 | Chloe | Gutierrez | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2020-01-21 | 72000 |
| 5 | Frank | Bell | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2023-05-21 | 73000 |
web_sessions40,000 rows · 7 columns
session_idintegercustomer_idintegerstarted_attimestampdevicevarcharsourcevarcharpages_viewedintegerconvertedboolean
| session_id | customer_id | started_at | device | source | pages_viewed | converted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NULL | 2023-01-01 23:02:24 | mobile | paid | 1 | false |
| 2 | 18 | 2023-01-01 15:07:49 | desktop | paid | 1 | false |
| 3 | NULL | 2023-01-01 16:55:46 | desktop | direct | 7 | false |
| 4 | NULL | 2023-01-01 12:43:28 | mobile | organic | 3 | false |
| 5 | NULL | 2023-01-01 13:06:21 | mobile | social | 2 | false |
marketing_spend3,276 rows · 3 columns
spend_datedatechannelvarcharamountdecimal
| spend_date | channel | amount |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-01 | paid | 492.99 |
| 2023-01-01 | 37.38 | |
| 2023-01-01 | social | 200.53 |
| 2023-01-02 | paid | 709.13 |
| 2023-01-02 | 64.13 |
The lesson
LAG looks at the previous row and LEAD at the next one. Both are only meaningful when “previous” and “next” stay inside the right group.
Spotting the bug
Run the gaps CTE on its own and look at a few rows in order: neighbouring rows belong to different
customers. Without PARTITION BY, the window is the whole table sorted by time, so LEAD returns the date
of the next order anyone placed. With about 10,800 completed orders over three years, that is usually
the same day, hence the 0.1-day average.
Two signs give it away: a gap that is physically implausible, and a “has a next order” count that is almost every order. Only one order in the whole table has no successor in the starter’s window, while in reality each customer’s last order has none.
LAG and LEAD together
SELECT order_id,
CAST(order_date AS DATE) AS order_day,
LAG(CAST(order_date AS DATE)) OVER w AS prev_day,
LEAD(CAST(order_date AS DATE)) OVER w AS next_day
FROM orders
WHERE status = 'completed' AND customer_id = 125
WINDOW w AS (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY order_date, order_id);
For customer 125 this lists eight completed orders, from 2023-01-01 to 2025-04-20. The gaps range from 2 days (November 30 to December 2, 2024, around Black Friday) to almost 11 months, which is why an average over many customers is more useful than any single gap. Checking one customer like this, with the partition in place, is the fastest way to see whether a window behaves before you aggregate it.
Same window, two directions: LAG answers “how long since the last order”, LEAD “how long until the next
one”. The named WINDOW clause avoids repeating the definition. On the first order prev_day is NULL,
on the last one next_day is NULL.
Common mistakes
- No PARTITION BY on a per-entity window.
- Subtracting timestamps instead of dates: you get an interval with hours, not whole days.
- Filtering the period before the window. Restricting to 2025 first hides a December 2024 order that was a customer’s real previous order.
In SQL Server
LEAD and LAG are written the same way. For day differences use DATEDIFF(day, order_day, next_order_day);
subtracting two dates directly does not work there. The WINDOW clause exists only from SQL Server 2022.
Lantern lit!
Practised: leadlagpartition bydebuggingdate difference
- Solved
- No hints
- First run
