The request

From Jordan Reyes, Head of Marketing
Your goal
Using the two summaries in the starter (2025 spend per channel from marketing_spend, 2025 sessions per source from web_sessions), return one row for every channel that appears in either summary, with: channel (the channel name, taken from whichever side has it), spend (NULL when there was no spend), sessions and conversions.
- Read from the
web_sessionstablenot done yet - Read from the
marketing_spendtablenot done yet - Show exactly
channelspendsessionsconversionsnot done yet
Your query
Loading the editor…
Reference solution
| session_id | customer_id | started_at | device | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NULL | 2023-01-01 23:02:24 | mobile | paid |
| 2 | 18 | 2023-01-01 15:07:49 | desktop | paid |
| 3 | NULL | 2023-01-01 16:55:46 | desktop | direct |
| 4 | NULL | 2023-01-01 12:43:28 | mobile | organic |
Mote checks your result
Press Run. Each row that matches the goal becomes a firefly in your lantern.
What Jordan gets, and why
Tables
Harbor & Pine store data, ready to query.
web_sessions40,000 rows · 7 columns
session_idintegercustomer_idintegerstarted_attimestampdevicevarcharsourcevarcharpages_viewedintegerconvertedboolean
| session_id | customer_id | started_at | device | source | pages_viewed | converted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NULL | 2023-01-01 23:02:24 | mobile | paid | 1 | false |
| 2 | 18 | 2023-01-01 15:07:49 | desktop | paid | 1 | false |
| 3 | NULL | 2023-01-01 16:55:46 | desktop | direct | 7 | false |
| 4 | NULL | 2023-01-01 12:43:28 | mobile | organic | 3 | false |
| 5 | NULL | 2023-01-01 13:06:21 | mobile | social | 2 | false |
marketing_spend3,276 rows · 3 columns
spend_datedatechannelvarcharamountdecimal
| spend_date | channel | amount |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-01 | paid | 492.99 |
| 2023-01-01 | 37.38 | |
| 2023-01-01 | social | 200.53 |
| 2023-01-02 | paid | 709.13 |
| 2023-01-02 | 64.13 |
customers2,018 rows · 9 columns
customer_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarcharemailvarcharcityvarcharstatevarcharsignup_datedatesegmentvarcharreferral_sourcevarchar
| customer_id | first_name | last_name | city | state | signup_date | segment | referral_source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen | Hudson | owen.hudson@icloud.com | San Francisco | CA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | search |
| 2 | Douglas | Mendoza | dmendoza69@gmail.com | Atlanta | GA | 2022-06-02 | consumer | NULL |
| 3 | Henry | Brooks | hbrooks@lakesidecafe.com | Los Angeles | CA | 2022-06-04 | business | NULL |
| 4 | Brian | Graham | bgraham@bluecedarhomes.com | Seattle | WA | 2022-06-06 | business | |
| 5 | Kyle | Jimenez | kjimenez27@yahoo.com | Indianapolis | IN | 2022-06-07 | consumer | NULL |
products120 rows · 8 columns
product_idintegernamevarcharcategoryvarcharsubcategoryvarcharunit_pricedecimalunit_costdecimallaunched_ondateis_activeboolean
| product_id | name | category | subcategory | unit_price | unit_cost | launched_on | is_active |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Vale Velvet Loveseat | Furniture | Sofas | 1659.00 | NULL | 2023-09-11 | true |
| 102 | Alder Oak Coffee Table | Furniture | Tables | 919.00 | 503.50 | 2024-05-16 | true |
| 103 | Orchard Rattan Dining Chair | Furniture | Chairs | 789.00 | 429.87 | 2023-05-27 | true |
| 104 | Upland Oak Bookcase | Furniture | Storage | 429.00 | 214.70 | 2022-12-20 | true |
| 105 | Avery Leather Bed Frame | Furniture | Beds | 449.00 | 232.70 | 2021-08-31 | true |
orders12,000 rows · 7 columns
order_idintegercustomer_idintegerorder_datetimestampstatusvarcharchannelvarcharshipping_feedecimalcoupon_codevarchar
| order_id | customer_id | order_date | status | channel | shipping_fee | coupon_code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | 125 | 2023-01-01 20:51:19 | completed | web | 0.00 | NULL |
| 1002 | 156 | 2023-01-02 07:58:46 | completed | web | 0.00 | NULL |
| 1003 | 22 | 2023-01-02 10:25:27 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1004 | 48 | 2023-01-02 11:21:51 | completed | marketplace | 4.99 | WELCOME10 |
| 1005 | 82 | 2023-01-02 11:43:36 | completed | web | 0.00 | WELCOME10 |
order_items30,338 rows · 6 columns
order_item_idintegerorder_idintegerproduct_idintegerquantityintegerunit_pricedecimaldiscount_pctdecimal
| order_item_id | order_id | product_id | quantity | unit_price | discount_pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1001 | 121 | 9 | 31.99 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 1001 | 154 | 3 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 1002 | 154 | 4 | 11.99 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 1002 | 194 | 1 | 149.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1002 | 193 | 2 | 19.99 | 0.00 |
returns1,673 rows · 5 columns
return_idintegerorder_item_idintegerreturned_ondatereasonvarcharrefund_amountdecimal
| return_id | order_item_id | returned_on | reason | refund_amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 2023-01-10 | damaged | 83.69 |
| 2 | 42 | 2023-01-10 | wrong_item | 19.99 |
| 3 | 105 | 2023-01-14 | wrong_item | 10.99 |
| 4 | 24 | 2023-01-16 | changed_mind | 26.99 |
| 5 | 126 | 2023-01-16 | late | 20.99 |
employees60 rows · 8 columns
employee_idintegerfirst_namevarcharlast_namevarchardepartmentvarchartitlevarcharmanager_idintegerhire_datedatesalaryinteger
| employee_id | first_name | last_name | department | title | manager_id | hire_date | salary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catherine | Hale | Executive | Chief Executive Officer | NULL | 2016-03-01 | 285000 |
| 2 | Robert | Kim | Executive | Chief Operating Officer | 1 | 2017-01-09 | 235000 |
| 3 | Megan | Collins | Sales | Head of Sales | 1 | 2018-04-16 | 172000 |
| 4 | Chloe | Gutierrez | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2020-01-21 | 72000 |
| 5 | Frank | Bell | Sales | Account Executive | 3 | 2023-05-21 | 73000 |
The lesson
So far you have used inner joins (only matches) and left joins (everything on the left, matches on the right). Two more join types complete the set.
RIGHT JOIN and FULL OUTER JOIN
A RIGHT JOIN Bkeeps every row of B. It is the same asB LEFT JOIN A, and most analysts rewrite it that way because reading left to right is easier.A FULL OUTER JOIN Bkeeps every row of both: matched pairs, plus rows of A with NULLs for B, plus rows of B with NULLs for A.
The 2025 summaries look like this when joined in full:
| channel | spend | sessions | conversions |
|---|---|---|---|
| paid | 340,778.33 | 3,585 | 55 |
| social | 131,540.77 | 2,563 | 19 |
| 38,322.22 | 1,946 | 187 | |
| organic | NULL | 5,540 | 100 |
| direct | NULL | 2,591 | 139 |
The inner join in the starter returns only the first three rows. Organic search brought the most sessions of any source and costs nothing in ad spend, which is exactly what the marketing head wants to see.
The starter uses subqueries in FROM (derived tables) so each side is already one row per channel before
the join. That avoids the fan-out you met earlier: joining raw daily spend rows to raw session rows would
multiply both.
Why not just a LEFT JOIN?
Today every spend channel also has sessions, so w LEFT JOIN s would give the same five rows. The full
join is still the safer choice for a reconciliation: if marketing starts paying for a channel that is not
tracked as a session source, a left join from sessions would hide that spend, and a FULL OUTER JOIN shows it.
Common mistakes
- Taking the key from one side only. Use
COALESCE(left_key, right_key). - Filtering a FULL OUTER JOIN in
WHEREon one side’s columns, for exampleWHERE s.spend > 0. That removes the NULL rows and turns it back into a narrower join.
In SQL Server
FULL OUTER JOIN and RIGHT JOIN are written the same way. ISNULL(s.channel, w.source) works like the
two-argument COALESCE. Booleans differ: SQL Server has no TRUE, so the flag is a bit and the
condition is CASE WHEN converted = 1 THEN 1 END.
Lantern lit!
Practised: full outer joinright joinleft joincoalescederived table
- Solved
- No hints
- First run
